top of page

Content here is incomplete, evolving, and subject to structured Delphi review. This is not a substitute for a final peer-reviewed resource, but rather a collaborative space .... a place where ideas develop, raw data is refined, and consensus is built. 

Refresh Navigation Filters

Neuroactive Steroid Anaesthetic

Intramuscular (IM) Recommendations

  • 🟩 Alfaxalone 3–5 mg/kg IM provides consistent immobilisation (20–40 min) with smooth recovery < 20 min [CS] (Arnemo & Søli 1995; Doss & de Miguel García 2022).

  • 🟨 Alfaxalone 5 mg/kg IM + Midazolam 1 mg/kg IM achieves deep sedation and muscle relaxation for diagnostic imaging [EC] (Rondeau et al. 2020; Heard 2014).

  • 🟨 Juvenile E. europaeus respond well to 3 mg/kg IM + Midazolam 1 mg/kg IM; avoid higher doses to prevent delayed recovery [EC] (Heard 2014).

  • ⬜ Dose reduction (~25 %) recommended in debilitated or hypothermic individuals; allow spontaneous recovery without reversal [EX] (Simone-Freilicher & Hoefer 2004).

Subcutaneous (SC) Recommendations

  • 🟩 Alfaxalone 3 mg/kg SC + Midazolam 1 mg/kg SC (mantle injection) produces heavy sedation within 10 min; full recovery < 20 min [CS] (Doss & de Miguel García 2022).

  • 🟨 Alfaxalone 5 mg/kg SC ± Midazolam 1 mg/kg SC for deeper restraint or venipuncture [EC] (Rondeau et al. 2020).

  • ⬜ Mantle or lateral thoracic SC sites recommended; avoid dorsal spines; maintain ambient > 24 °C [EX] (Simone-Freilicher & Hoefer 2004).

Intravenous (IV) Recommendations

  • 🟨 Alfaxalone 2–4 mg/kg IV to effect after Midazolam 0.5 mg/kg IM premedication provides smooth short-term anaesthesia [EC] (Heard 2014; Jones 2012).

  • ⬜ Limited IV data; protocol extrapolated from small-mammal and chelonians [EX] (Jones 2012; Bertelsen & Sauer 2011).

Evidence Base

Strong Evidence ([CS]/[PK])

  • 🟩 [CS] Arnemo, J.M., Søli, N.E., 1995. Chemical immobilisation of free-ranging European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 26, 246–251.

  • 🟩 [CS] Doss, G.A., de Miguel García, A., 2022. Sedative effects of alfaxalone and midazolam in hedgehogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 49, —.

Moderate Evidence ([EC]/[CL])

  • 🟨 [EC] Hoefer, H.L., 1994. Hedgehogs. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 24, 113–120.

  • 🟨 [EC] Simone-Freilicher, E.A., Hoefer, H.L., 2004. Hedgehog care and husbandry. Veterinary Clinics of Exotic Animal Practice 7, 257–267.

  • 🟨 [EC] Heard, D., 2014. Insectivores (Hedgehogs, Moles and Tenrecs). In: West, G., Heard, D., Caulkett, N. (Eds.), Zoo Animal and Wildlife Immobilization and Anesthesia, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ames, IA, 529–531.

  • 🟨 [EC] Jones, K.L., 2012. Therapeutic review: Alfaxalone. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 21, 347–353.

Weak Evidence ([EX])

  • ⬜ [EX] Sainsbury, A.W., Cunningham, A.A., Morris, P.A., et al., 1996. Health and welfare of rehabilitated juvenile hedgehogs before and after release. Veterinary Record 138, 61–65.

  • ⬜ [EX] Morris, P.A., 1998. Hedgehog rehabilitation in perspective. Veterinary Record 143, 633–636.

Intramuscular (IM) Recommendations

  • 🟩 Alfaxalone 5 mg/kg IM provides reliable anaesthesia (25–40 min) with smooth recovery < 20 min [CS] (Doss & de Miguel García 2022).

  • 🟨 Alfaxalone 5 mg/kg IM + Midazolam 1 mg/kg IM achieves deep sedation for diagnostic and minor surgical procedures [EC] (Hausmann, Doss & Mans 2021; Heard 2014).

  • 🟨 Juvenile A. albiventris respond to 3–4 mg/kg IM + Midazolam 1 mg/kg IM with shorter recovery (10–15 min) [EC] (Simone-Freilicher & Hoefer 2004).

  • ⬜ Reduce to ≈ 3 mg/kg IM in cold or anorectic hedgehogs; avoid α₂-agonists unless reversible support available [EX] (Hoefer 1994; Jones 2012).

Subcutaneous (SC) Recommendations

  • 🟩 Alfaxalone 3–4 mg/kg SC + Midazolam 1 mg/kg SC (mantle injection) produces moderate restraint; recovery < 20 min [CS] (Doss & de Miguel García 2022).

  • 🟨 Alfaxalone 5 mg/kg SC + Midazolam 1 mg/kg SC for longer sedation (30–40 min) or non-painful procedures [EC] (Rondeau et al. 2020; Simone-Freilicher & Hoefer 2004).

  • ⬜ Inject into mantle or lateral thoracic region; maintain ambient temperature ≥ 24 °C [EX] (Simone-Freilicher & Hoefer 2004).

Intravenous (IV) Recommendations

  • 🟨 Alfaxalone 2–3 mg/kg IV to effect after Midazolam 0.5 mg/kg IM premedication produces short-duration anaesthesia with smooth recovery [EC] (Heard 2014; Jones 2012).

  • ⬜ No controlled IV data in A. albiventris; protocol extrapolated from small-mammal and reptile models [EX] (Jones 2012; Bertelsen & Sauer 2011).

Evidence Base

Strong Evidence ([CS]/[PK])

  • 🟩 [CS] Doss, G.A., de Miguel García, A., 2022. Sedative effects of alfaxalone and midazolam in hedgehogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 49, —.

Moderate Evidence ([EC]/[CL])

  • 🟨 [EC] Hausmann, N., Doss, G.A., Mans, C., 2021. Injectable anaesthesia alternatives in hedgehogs: alfaxalone-midazolam versus ketamine-midazolam. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 40, 112–120.

  • 🟨 [EC] Heard, D., 2014. Insectivores (Hedgehogs, Moles and Tenrecs). In: West, G., Heard, D., Caulkett, N. (Eds.), Zoo Animal and Wildlife Immobilization and Anesthesia, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ames, IA, 529–531.

  • 🟨 [EC] Simone-Freilicher, E.A., Hoefer, H.L., 2004. Hedgehog care and husbandry. Veterinary Clinics of Exotic Animal Practice 7, 257–267.

  • 🟨 [EC] Rondeau, M., et al., 2020. Comparative sedative responses to alfaxalone and ketamine in small mammals. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 33, 120–126.

  • 🟨 [EC] Jones, K.L., 2012. Therapeutic review: Alfaxalone. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 21, 347–353.

Weak Evidence ([EX])

  • ⬜ [EX] Hoefer, H.L., 1994. Hedgehogs. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 24, 113–120.

  • ⬜ [EX] Bertelsen, M.F., Sauer, C.D., 2011. Alfaxalone anaesthesia in the green iguana (Iguana iguana). Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 38, 461–466.

  • ⬜ [EX] McArthur, S., Wilkinson, R., Meyer, J., 2004. Medicine and Surgery of Tortoises and Turtles. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

Alfaxalone is a synthetic neuroactive steroid anaesthetic agent, structurally related to progesterone but lacking hormonal activity, that exerts its effect through modulation of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA<sub>A</sub>) receptor complex in the central nervous system (CNS) (Ferre et al., 2006; Hikasa et al., 2011). It is classified as a short-acting, non-barbiturate intravenous anaesthetic, and is primarily used for the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in small animals, exotic species, and select large animal applications, often as part of a balanced anaesthesia protocol (Muir et al., 2008; Whittem et al., 2008).


First introduced in combination with alfadolone acetate in the 1970s (marketed as Saffan®) and formulated with Cremophor EL, its use was initially restricted due to adverse hypersensitivity reactions, particularly in dogs, attributed to the solubilising agent rather than the active steroid molecules themselves (Clarke et al., 1981; Young, 1997). Modern formulations, such as Alfaxan® and its generic equivalents, utilise 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin as a carrier, significantly improving safety and reducing the incidence of histamine-mediated reactions (Whittem et al., 2008; Ferré et al., 2006).


Alfaxalone produces rapid, smooth induction with minimal excitation and rapid recovery, characteristics that make it particularly valuable for short procedures, for animals with cardiovascular compromise, and for species in which alternative agents carry a high risk of respiratory depression or prolonged recovery (Hikasa et al., 2011; Keates and Whittem, 2012). It is non-cumulative at clinically relevant doses, has a relatively wide safety margin, and is approved for both intravenous and intramuscular administration in many species, including off-label use under the veterinary cascade for exotic pets and wildlife (Whittem et al., 2008; Robertson et al., 2017).


The drug’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles vary considerably between species, with notable differences in onset, duration, and cardiovascular impact. Consequently, species-specific dosing and monitoring are critical for safe and effective administration (Keates and Whittem, 2012; Muir et al., 2008). Alfaxalone is increasingly recognised as a valuable alternative to propofol and ketamine in certain contexts, particularly where cardiovascular stability and rapid recovery are desired, and in cases where preservation of spontaneous respiration is beneficial (Beths et al., 2014; Ferreira et al., 2015). 


Alfaxalone is a synthetic neuroactive steroid anaesthetic that produces its effects through positive allosteric modulation of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA-A) receptor. Binding occurs at neurosteroid recognition sites within the receptor’s transmembrane domain, enhancing GABA-mediated chloride ion influx, hyperpolarising neuronal membranes, and reducing excitability. At higher concentrations, alfaxalone can directly activate GABA-A receptors without endogenous GABA present, producing dose-dependent sedation to anaesthesia (Albertson et al., 1992; Harrison and Simmonds, 1984a, 1984b).

PD–PK Relationships

Rapid onset is due to high lipid solubility and fast penetration across the blood–brain barrier, with effect termination after a single bolus driven primarily by redistribution rather than metabolism. Prolonged infusions or repeated boluses can lead to accumulation in species with slower clearance. In cats, effective plasma concentrations for immobility are around 2–3 µg/mL (Pypendop et al., 2018; Ferré et al., 2006).


Onset and Duration of Effect

Intravenous administration produces anaesthetic induction within 30–60 seconds in most species. Surgical anaesthesia following a single bolus is typically 5–10 minutes in duration, with recovery within 15–30 minutes due to redistribution from the central nervous system to peripheral tissues. Elimination half-life varies between species but is generally 24–45 minutes. Intramuscular administration results in a slower onset (5–10 minutes) and slightly prolonged effect (Pasloske et al., 2009; Rodrigo-Mocholí et al., 2018).

Central Nervous System Effects

Alfaxalone induces a smooth transition from consciousness to anaesthesia and recovery, with minimal excitatory phenomena when premedication is used. It provides hypnosis but negligible analgesia, requiring concurrent analgesics for painful procedures. In canine refractory status epilepticus, alfaxalone achieved seizure control without provoking convulsions. Recovery quality is maintained even after prolonged infusions when clinically dosed (Al Kafaji et al., 2024; Warne et al., 2015).

Cardiovascular Effects

Dose-dependent reductions in arterial blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance occur, with heart rate changes dependent on reflex compensation. Clinically relevant doses generally cause mild, transient hypotension, but rapid bolus injection or supraclinical dosing can cause more pronounced depression. Effects are broadly similar across species but may be accentuated in hypovolaemic or debilitated animals (Muir et al., 2008; Muir et al., 2009; Dehuisser et al., 2019).

Respiratory Effects

Transient apnoea and hypoventilation are the principal respiratory effects, most likely with rapid intravenous bolus administration or when combined with other CNS depressants. Dose-related respiratory depression has been reported in dogs, cats, rabbits, and reptiles. Oxygen supplementation during induction and maintenance is recommended to mitigate hypoxaemia (Keates and Whittem, 2012; Rousseau-Blass and Pang, 2020).

Other Physiological Effects

Alfaxalone reduces intracranial pressure and cerebral metabolic rate while preserving or enhancing cerebral perfusion pressure under normocapnia. It lowers intraocular pressure, which can be advantageous in ophthalmic procedures. Hepatic and renal blood flow are generally preserved at clinical doses. Cardiovascular and IOP changes are typically smaller than with propofol (Bauer and Ambros, 2016; Shilo-Benjamini et al., 2023).


Alfaxalone (alfaxalone–HPCD formulation) is a neuroactive steroid anaesthetic with a rapid onset and short duration. Across the species, it shows extensive tissue distribution, hepatic metabolism, and short elimination half-lives; in cats, dose-dependent nonlinearity has been described, whereas dogs display approximately linear kinetics at clinical doses (Warne et al., 2015; Whittem et al., 2008; Ferré et al., 2006).


Alfaxalone is authorised for intravenous use in dogs, cats and rabbits for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia, including total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and constant rate infusion (CRI), and has also been used intramuscularly in these species for sedation or anaesthesia when intravenous access is not practical (Dehuisser et al., 2019; Rodrigo-Mocholí et al., 2018; Cruz-Benedetti et al., 2018; Bradley et al., 2019; Costa et al., 2023).


At the time of writing, alfaxalone has been successfully administered by various routes for both anaesthesia and sedation in a wide range of veterinary species, including mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians (Chiu et al., 2016; SPC data).


  • Intravenous (IV): In cats, dogs, and rabbits, alfaxalone is authorised for IV use as a bolus or via CRI for anaesthesia and sedation. IV use is also standard in certain unauthorised species, including birds, where smooth induction and recovery have been reported (Chiu et al., 2016; White and Martinez-Taboada, 2019).

  • Intramuscular (IM): IM administration of alfaxalone is widely employed for sedation and anaesthesia in cats, dogs, and rabbits, often in multimodal protocols with sedatives or analgesics (Bradley et al., 2019; Murdock et al., 2020; Tamura et al., 2015). IM use is also reported in unauthorised species such as lizards (Bertelsen and Sauer, 2011) and chelonians (Scarabelli and Di Girolamo, 2022), where it provides reliable immobilisation for diagnostic or minor surgical procedures.

  • Intraperitoneal (IP): In laboratory rats, alfaxalone administered intraperitoneally produces variable sedation and anaesthesia; most reports describe adequate effect, though onset and depth may be inconsistent (Lau et al., 2013).

  • Intracoelomic (ICo): Although less frequently reported, intracoelomic administration has been used in reptiles when other routes are not feasible, with effectiveness depending on species and dosing regimen (Scarabelli and Di Girolamo, 2022).

  • Subcutaneous (SC): SC alfaxalone has been used successfully as a sole agent in bearded dragons and snakes, producing smooth sedation with minimal cardiorespiratory compromise (Doss et al., 2017; Webb et al., 2023; Rockwell et al., 2021). In guinea pigs and mice, SC administration is more often part of multimodal protocols, contributing to stable anaesthesia and smooth recoveries (Avelino et al., 2024; Young et al., 2024).

  • Intraosseous (IO): IO administration has been used successfully in chelonians, offering an alternative route when IV or IM access is not possible (Scarabelli and Di Girolamo, 2022).

  • Transcutaneous: Amphibians have been anaesthetised by immersion in a water bath containing alfaxalone, allowing dermal absorption to achieve surgical anaesthesia (Jones, 2012; McMillan and Leece, 2011).

Alfaxalone displays route-dependent absorption characteristics. Intravenous administration provides immediate bioavailability, with onset of effect occurring within 30–60 seconds across mammalian species. Intramuscular and subcutaneous routes produce slower absorption and greater variability, with peak plasma concentrations occurring within 5–15 minutes depending on species and formulation. Oral absorption is poor due to extensive first-pass metabolism, precluding this route for clinical use. The cyclodextrin-based formulation (Alfaxan®) improves solubility and systemic absorption following parenteral administration (Child et al., 1972; Pasloske et al., 2009; Rodrigo-Mocholí et al., 2018)


Alfaxalone is a highly lipophilic neuroactive steroid, resulting in rapid penetration across the blood–brain barrier and widespread distribution into highly perfused tissues. Following intravenous administration, plasma protein binding is moderate, and distribution volumes are large in both dogs and cats, consistent with extensive tissue uptake. Redistribution from the brain to muscle and fat is the principal determinant of anaesthetic recovery after a single bolus, with hepatic metabolism and renal clearance contributing to elimination at later time points (Ferré et al., 2006; Pasloske et al., 2009). 


Alfaxalone is extensively metabolised in the liver through hydroxylation and conjugation pathways. Following redistribution from the central nervous system, hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes mediate hydroxylation of the steroid nucleus, followed by glucuronidation and sulfation. These metabolites are water-soluble and excreted primarily in the urine, with a smaller proportion in bile. In dogs and cats, systemic clearance is rapid, with hepatic metabolism accounting for the majority of elimination after redistribution. There is no evidence of metabolite accumulation at clinical doses, though prolonged infusions may extend recovery due to saturation of metabolic pathways in some species (Ferré et al., 2006; Pasloske et al., 2009; Muir et al., 2008; Rodrigo-Mocholí et al., 2018).


Mixed Routes

  • Alfaxalone metabolites are eliminated from rabbits, dogs, and cats by the hepatic, faecal, and renal routes, which are expected to be similar in other species. 

  • In dogs and cats, the elimination of Alfaxalone demonstrates non-linear (dose-dependent) pharmacokinetics.


Alphaxalone, a neuroactive steroid anaesthetic agent, is generally well tolerated when administered at clinically appropriate doses, but adverse effects can occur, particularly at higher doses, rapid injection rates, or in animals with comorbidities. The agent’s safety profile is influenced by its cardiovascular stability compared to other induction agents, but dose-dependent respiratory depression, transient hypotension, and occasional excitatory phenomena have been documented. The majority of adverse events are reversible with appropriate supportive care. Risk mitigation strategies include dose adjustment in compromised patients, careful monitoring during induction and recovery, and incorporation of multimodal anaesthetic protocols (Ferré et al., 2006; Pasloske et al., 2009; Rodrigo-Mocholí et al., 2018).

Neurological Effects

  • Transient excitement, paddling, and muscle tremors have been observed during both induction and recovery, more commonly when alphaxalone is administered without premedication. The underlying mechanism is believed to involve imbalanced modulation of GABA_A receptor subtypes in the absence of adjunct sedatives. Recovery quality is generally improved with premedication using benzodiazepines or α2-agonists (Ferré et al., 2006; Muir et al., 2008).

Cardiovascular Effects

  • Mild to moderate, dose-dependent hypotension is reported following alphaxalone induction, attributed to decreased systemic vascular resistance. Significant bradycardia is uncommon but can occur with concurrent administration of other negative chronotropes. Cardiovascular depression may be more pronounced in animals with pre-existing myocardial compromise (Ferré et al., 2006; Pasloske et al., 2009).

Respiratory Effects

  • Respiratory depression, including apnoea, may occur following rapid intravenous administration, high doses, or in combination with other respiratory depressants. Apnoea events are typically transient but can require manual or mechanical ventilation. Oxygen supplementation and capnography are recommended during induction and maintenance (Ferré et al., 2006; Muir et al., 2008).

Gastrointestinal Effects

  • No direct emetogenic effects have been described for alphaxalone; however, transient gastrointestinal hypomotility may occur secondary to sedation and reduced autonomic tone. Post-anaesthetic ileus risk is more relevant in hindgut fermenters (Muir et al., 2008).

Musculoskeletal Effects

  • Involuntary muscle movements, rigidity, or opisthotonus can occur during recovery, particularly in animals not premedicated with muscle relaxants or sedatives. These effects are generally self-limiting (Ferré et al., 2006).

Renal & Urinary Effects

  • No direct nephrotoxic effects have been reported for alphaxalone. Transient reductions in renal perfusion may occur secondary to systemic hypotension in susceptible patients (Pasloske et al., 2009).

Haematological Effects

  • No haematological toxicities have been reported. Minor alterations in haematocrit or plasma proteins post-anaesthesia are generally attributable to perioperative haemodynamics rather than direct drug effect.

Dermatological & Hypersensitivity Reactions

  • Anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity reactions are rare but possible with intravenous formulations. Clinical signs include hypotension, tachycardia, urticaria, and in severe cases, cardiovascular collapse. Immediate discontinuation and administration of appropriate emergency interventions (e.g., epinephrine, corticosteroids) are indicated (Ferré et al., 2006).

Endocrine & Metabolic Effects

  • No direct endocrine disturbances have been identified. Transient decreases in body temperature are common due to peripheral vasodilation and reduced metabolic rate, especially in small-bodied species.

Pain

  • Alphaxalone has no intrinsic analgesic properties. For any painful procedure, additional analgesic agents must be included in the anaesthetic protocol. Pain scoring should be performed throughout the perioperative period using any validated species-specific pain scoring system, and adjustments to analgesia should be made promptly to maintain patient comfort (Pasloske et al., 2009; Muir et al., 2008).

Other Considerations

  • Hepatopathy — Alphaxalone is primarily metabolised hepatically; therefore, patients with liver disease may exhibit prolonged recovery and increased susceptibility to cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Dose reduction is advisable in such cases, and recovery should be closely monitored (Ferré et al., 2006; Rodrigo-Mocholí et al., 2018).

  • Neonates — Neonatal patients are at higher risk of hypothermia due to immature thermoregulatory capacity and of overdose due to immature hepatic metabolism. Anaesthesia in neonates is technically more challenging, and stable, safe anaesthetic depth can be harder to achieve. Warmth preservation and cautious titration to effect are essential, and consideration should be given to dose reduction relative to adult protocols (Ferré et al., 2006; Pasloske et al., 2009).

Risk mitigation when using alphaxalone as an anaesthetic induction or maintenance agent involves careful patient selection, optimisation of the peri-anaesthetic environment, and rigorous monitoring before, during, and after administration. Proactive management of known adverse effect risks is essential to ensure a safe anaesthetic course across species (Ferré et al., 2006; Pasloske et al., 2009).

ASA Status and Patient Selection

  • Anaesthetic risk increases with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III–V patients, where underlying disease can exacerbate cardiorespiratory depression or delayed recovery (Robertson et al., 2012). Elective procedures in unstable patients should be postponed until comorbidities are optimised. For patients with hepatic impairment, dose reduction is advisable due to the primary hepatic metabolism of alphaxalone and the potential for prolonged effect (Pasloske et al., 2009; Rodrigo-Mocholí et al., 2018).

Preoperative Assessment and Stabilisation

  • A thorough preoperative evaluation should include full history, clinical examination, and, where appropriate, haematology, serum biochemistry, and imaging to identify underlying disease and optimise patient stability (Flecknell, 2016). Fluid deficits, electrolyte disturbances, hypothermia, and hypoglycaemia should be corrected before induction. In neonates, thermoregulation and glucose support require particular attention due to their higher risk of hypothermia and overdose (Gaynor & Muir, 2009).

Induction Protocol

  • Alphaxalone should be administered slowly to effect via an appropriately sized intravenous catheter to minimise apnoea and hypotension (Ferré et al., 2006; Muir et al., 2008). Pre-oxygenation for 3–5 minutes before induction reduces the impact of any transient apnoea. Where IV access is not possible, IM administration should use the lowest effective dose, recognising slower onset and recovery (Uilenreef et al., 2008). Co-administration with sedatives or analgesics can reduce the alphaxalone dose required and improve induction smoothness, but combinations should be based on validated species-specific protocols.

Anaesthetic Environment

  • Maintain a quiet, low-stress environment to minimise excitement during induction and recovery (Muir et al., 2008). Ensure that appropriate airway management equipment is available, including endotracheal tubes, V-Gel devices, laryngoscopes, and suction. Heat support devices should be prepared to maintain normothermia, particularly in small mammals, reptiles, and neonates.

Intraoperative Monitoring

  • Continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate, end-tidal CO₂, and blood pressure is recommended to detect early signs of cardiorespiratory compromise (Flecknell, 2016; Robertson et al., 2012). In species where standard monitoring equipment is challenging to apply, alternative validated techniques (e.g. Doppler blood flow probes, capnography via face mask) should be employed. Ventilatory support should be available for patients showing hypoventilation or apnoea.

Post-Anaesthetic Recovery

  • Recovery should occur in a warm, quiet, and closely monitored environment, with supplemental oxygen and airway support maintained until the patient can sustain adequate spontaneous ventilation (Pasloske et al., 2009). Analgesia must be provided for all painful procedures, as alphaxalone has no intrinsic analgesic effect; pain scoring should be performed throughout recovery using a validated system for the species (Gaynor & Muir, 2009). Post-anaesthetic monitoring should continue until the patient is fully ambulatory, normothermic, and physiologically stable.

  • Severe cardiovascular instability – Avoid in uncompensated shock or marked hypotension; alfaxalone’s dose-dependent vasodilation can precipitate collapse ✅ [CS] (Whittem et al., 2008; Muir et al., 2009).

  • Profound hepatic impairment – Metabolism is predominantly hepatic; recovery may be prolonged in reptiles and small mammals 🟨 [EC] (McArthur et al., 2004; Hedley 2023).

  • Respiratory depression risk – Rapid IV injection can induce apnoea; inject slowly ≥ 60 s and pre-oxygenate ✅ [CS] (Huynh et al., 2015).

  • Hypoproteinaemia / severe anaemia – Reduced protein binding increases free drug fraction and deepens CNS depression 🟨 [EC].

  • Extreme hypothermia – Anaesthetic metabolism and ventilatory drive fall sharply below species thermal optima; delay induction 🟨 [EC] (Kischinovsky et al., 2013).

By Species

  • Chelonians – At < 25 °C, markedly delayed recovery and ventilatory suppression; reduce dose and maintain warmth 🟨 [EC] (McArthur et al., 2004).

  • Birds (Psittacines) – Transient apnoea and excessive restraint reported ≥ 20 mg/kg IM; titrate 10–12 mg/kg ✅ [CS] (Kubiak et al., 2016).

  • Lagomorphs (Rabbits / Hares) – Apnoea with rapid IV or potent opioid co-use; employ slow incremental bolus ✅ [CS] (Huynh et al., 2015; Navarrete-Calvo et al., 2014).

  • Insectivores (Hedgehogs) – Bradycardia + hypothermia under deep sedation; active warming essential 🟨 [EC] (Simone-Freilicher & Hoefer 2004; Heard 2014).

  • Reptiles (Snakes / Lizards) – Temperature-dependent metabolism lengthens recovery; maintain thermal support ✅ [CS] (Kischinovsky et al., 2013).

By Co-medication

  • Barbiturates (e.g. Thiopental) – Additive CNS depression; avoid sequential induction 🟨 [EC].

  • Alpha-2 agonists (e.g. Medetomidine, Dexmedetomidine) – Potentiated bradycardia / hypotension; titrate cautiously ✅ [CS] (Knotek et al., 2014).

  • µ-opioids (e.g. Morphine, Methadone) – Synergistic respiratory depression; reduce dose or oxygenate ✅ [CS] (Whitehead 2019).

  • Benzodiazepines (e.g. Midazolam) – Useful synergy but can prolong recovery; monitor reflexes 🟨 [EC].

  • CYP450 inhibitors (azoles, macrolides) – Possible prolongation of anaesthetic action; lower CRI rate 🟨 [EC].

  • Pregnancy / Egg-laying reptiles or birds – Limited safety data; potential fetal or embryonic depression 🟨 [EC].

  • Severe hypothermia or anaemia in wildlife patients – Stabilise before induction 🟨 [EC].

  • Prolonged procedures without airway control – Intubation mandatory > 15 min ✅ [CS].

  • Post-ictal or head-trauma patients – Transient intracranial-pressure rise possible; consider alternative induction 🟨 [EC].

  • Renal failure with metabolic acidosis – CNS sensitivity heightened; titrate carefully 🟨 [EC].

🟧. Caution

  • Clinical Guidance: Use with caution during pregnancy; reserve for cases where the benefits outweigh the potential risks. Alfaxalone has been used in pregnant animals for Caesarean section anaesthesia, but caution is warranted due to limited long-term safety data and potential for transient neonatal respiratory depression.

  • Evidence Summary: Experimental and clinical data in dogs and cats indicate alfaxalone crosses the placenta, but neonatal outcomes are generally favourable when adequate resuscitation protocols are available (Grint et al., 2004; Whittem et al., 2008). No teratogenic effects have been reported in available studies, but the paucity of controlled reproductive toxicity trials in veterinary species necessitates a risk–benefit approach.


🟧. Caution

  • Clinical Guidance: Use with caution during lactation. However, short-acting and rapidly metabolised, neonatal sedation or respiratory depression is possible if nursing is delayed soon after maternal anaesthesia.

  • Evidence Summary: No published data quantify alfaxalone excretion into milk in veterinary species. Based on its rapid clearance and lipophilicity, minimal transfer is expected, but avoidance of nursing during the immediate recovery period is recommended (Whittem et al., 2008; Pasloske et al., 2009).


⬜️  Unknown | No Data Located

  • Clinical Guidance: No evidence of adverse effects on male fertility in veterinary patients; use without specific restrictions when clinically indicated.

  • Evidence Summary: No studies have evaluated the direct effects of alfaxalone on sperm parameters or mating behaviour in target veterinary species. Anaesthetic exposure is not expected to impair fertility due to rapid drug clearance and absence of known gonadotoxic mechanisms (Pasloske et al., 2009).


⬜️  Unknown | No Data Located


  • Clinical Guidance: No evidence of adverse effects on female fertility; insufficient data to make definitive conclusions.

  • Evidence Summary: No published reproductive toxicity studies in non-pregnant females are available for veterinary species. The absence of hormonal or ovarian toxicity in other species suggests a low risk, but evidence is limited (Pasloske et al., 2009).


🟥  Avoid

  • Clinical Guidance: Avoid unless the clinical benefits of maternal anaesthesia outweigh potential neonatal compromise. If use is unavoidable, ensure active resuscitation and oxygen supplementation.

  • Evidence Summary: Placental transfer of alfaxalone can result in transient neonatal depression, particularly if maternal hypoxia or hypotension occurs during induction (Grint et al., 2004; Whittem et al., 2008). Recovery is usually rapid with supportive care, but immature hepatic metabolism in neonates may prolong drug clearance.


⬜️. Unknown

  • Clinical Guidance: No data are available on long-term carcinogenic or mutagenic potential in veterinary species.

  • Evidence Summary: No studies have evaluated the carcinogenic or mutagenic profile of alfaxalone in animals. Its short duration of exposure during anaesthesia and steroid structure make long-term genotoxicity unlikely, but the absence of formal testing means the risk remains unclassified (Pasloske et al., 2009).


🟩  Alpha-2 Adrenoceptor Agonists (e.g. Medetomidine, Xylazine)

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: Combined sedative and anaesthetic effects via different CNS targets result in enhanced sedation and reduced alfaxalone requirements.

  • Clinical Note: Safe co-use supported in authorised veterinary protocols. Monitor for bradycardia and respiratory depression (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟧. Anticholinergics (e.g. Atropine)

  • Interaction Type: Supportive (autonomic regulation)

  • Mechanism: Anticholinergics reduce vagal tone and bradycardia associated with sedative or opioid use, indirectly stabilising anaesthetic depth.

  • Clinical Note: Included in authorised veterinary anaesthetic protocols with alfaxalone. Use caution in rabbits and rodents due to species variability (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Benzodiazepines (e.g. Diazepam, Midazolam)

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: Potentiation of GABAergic inhibition via distinct receptor binding enhances sedative and muscle relaxant effects.

  • Clinical Note: Reduces the required alfaxalone dose and improves induction quality. Routine co-administration supported by clinical use (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

⬜️. NSAIDs (e.g. Carprofen, Meloxicam)

  • Interaction Type: No interaction (supportive analgesia)

  • Mechanism: NSAIDs do not alter alfaxalone pharmacodynamics but provide multimodal perioperative analgesia.

  • Clinical Note: Included in authorised protocols; appropriate for pre- or post-operative use. Monitor hydration and renal function in exotic species (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Opiates (e.g. Buprenorphine, Butorphanol, Methadone, Morphine)

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: Additive sedative and analgesic effects via opioid and GABA receptor modulation reduce anaesthetic dose needs.

  • Clinical Note: Well-established in multimodal anaesthetic protocols. Monitor respiratory rate and depth; titrate carefully in small mammals (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Phenothiazines (e.g. Acepromazine)

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: Dopamine antagonism and sedative synergy with GABAergic anaesthetics enhance tranquilisation.

  • Clinical Note: May contribute to dose-sparing of alfaxalone. Risk of hypotension and hypothermia in small species must be monitored (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Acepromazine

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: Central dopamine antagonism and tranquilisation enhance anaesthetic effect.

  • Clinical Note: Reduces required alfaxalone dose. Monitor blood pressure and temperature intraoperatively (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟧. Atropine

  • Interaction Type: Supportive (autonomic modulation)

  • Mechanism: Counteracts parasympathetic effects from concurrent opioid or sedative use.

  • Clinical Note: Appropriate in premedication protocols, especially in species with high vagal tone (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Buprenorphine

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: Partial μ-opioid receptor activation augments anaesthetic depth and analgesia.

  • Clinical Note: Common in exotic protocols; adjust alfaxalone dose accordingly (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Butorphanol

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: Kappa agonist/sigma antagonist properties enhance sedation and analgesia in combination.

  • Clinical Note: Safe and effective adjunct. May require reduced alfaxalone dosing (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

⬜️. Carprofen

  • Interaction Type: No interaction

  • Mechanism: NSAID analgesia is complementary and not directly interactive with alfaxalone.

  • Clinical Note: Common in perioperative plans; monitor renal function in reptiles and lagomorphs (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Diazepam

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: Potentiation of GABA-mediated inhibition improves anaesthetic induction and muscle relaxation.
    Clinical Note: Use is routine in many species. Particularly useful for seizure-prone animals (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Medetomidine

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: Profound sedation and analgesia via α<sub>2</sub> agonism lowers the alfaxalone dose requirement.

  • Clinical Note: Well-tolerated. Monitor bradycardia and prolonged recovery in sensitive species (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

⬜️. Meloxicam

  • Interaction Type: No interaction

  • Mechanism: NSAID analgesia augments surgical comfort without CNS effects.

  • Clinical Note: Common in reptiles, birds, and small mammals. Renal parameters should be monitored perioperatively (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Methadone

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: Full μ-opioid receptor agonism increases depth and quality of anaesthesia.

  • Clinical Note: Monitor respiration and temperature. Effective in balanced protocols (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Midazolam

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: Short-acting GABA agonist enhances induction and facilitates muscle relaxation.

  • Clinical Note: Useful in exotic species due to short half-life and safety profile (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Morphine

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: Opioid action adds to anaesthetic depth and analgesic effect.

  • Clinical Note: Potent sedative combination. Use cautiously in species sensitive to opioid respiratory effects (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Xylazine

  • Interaction Type: Synergistic (CNS depression)

  • Mechanism: α<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic agonism synergises with alfaxalone for sedation and anaesthesia.

  • Clinical Note: Older agent; may be less predictable than medetomidine. Monitor for vomiting in cats (Alfaxan Multidose SPC, 2020).

🟩. Water for Injection (WFI)

  • Interaction Type: Compatible

  • Mechanism: Approved for use as a diluent for injectable medications.

  • Clinical Note: Used for IV catheter flushing or dilution in infusion protocols.

🟩. Sodium Chloride (0.9% NaCl)

  • Interaction Type: Compatible

  • Mechanism: Physiological vehicle for parenteral administration.

  • Clinical Note: Compatible with alfaxalone for IV delivery in clinical protocols.

Alfaxalone is a synthetic neuroactive steroid anaesthetic that acts as a positive allosteric modulator of GABA<sub>A</sub> receptors, producing hypnosis and muscle relaxation without analgesia. It has a rapid onset and short duration of action due to redistribution and hepatic metabolism. While generally well tolerated within clinical dose ranges, toxicity can occur with overdose, overly rapid intravenous administration, or when combined with other CNS depressants. Risk factors include cardiovascular instability, respiratory compromise, hypovolaemia, and impaired hepatic function. The most critical concerns are dose-dependent cardiorespiratory depression, apnoea, hypotension, loss of airway reflexes, and in some cases excitatory motor phenomena during recovery (Whittem et al., 2008; Ferré et al., 2006; Warne et al., 2015).

Clinical Presentation

Toxic effects range from prolonged sedation and ataxia to severe CNS and cardiovascular depression. Early signs include delayed recovery from anaesthesia, recumbency beyond expected duration, and diminished response to stimulation. As severity increases, hypoventilation or apnoea develops, accompanied by hypoxaemia and hypercapnia. Cardiovascular changes include hypotension secondary to decreased systemic vascular resistance and mild negative inotropy, as well as bradycardia or reflex tachycardia. Weak pulses and prolonged capillary refill times may be noted. Severe cases can progress to cardiovascular collapse. Hypothermia is common and may exacerbate other complications. During recovery, patients may experience myoclonus, paddling, or transient excitement; seizures are rare but have been documented following excessive dosing or rapid administration (Whittem et al., 2008; Maney et al., 2013).

Clinical Response

  1. Cease administration immediately and secure airway via endotracheal intubation if protective reflexes are lost or ventilation is inadequate (Whittem et al., 2008).

  2. Administer supplemental oxygen and initiate manual or mechanical ventilation as needed to correct hypoxaemia and maintain normocapnia (Ferré et al., 2006).

  3. Support circulation with isotonic crystalloid boluses; if hypotension persists, add inotropes/vasopressors such as dopamine or noradrenaline (Warne et al., 2015).

  4. Continuous monitoring of ECG, blood pressure, SpO₂, and end-tidal CO₂ until full recovery.

  5. Manage hypothermia with active warming to restore normothermia.

  6. Avoid additional CNS depressants during recovery; if emergence excitation is severe, administer titrated doses of short-acting sedatives (Ferré et al., 2006).

  7. Post-incident review to adjust protocols, administration rate, and drug combinations to prevent recurrence.

Pending


Pending


Pending


Pending


Alfaxalone is authorised for veterinary use across Europe, the United Kingdom, and the United States. It is formulated exclusively as an injectable anaesthetic for dogs, cats, and, in the UK, pet rabbits. No oral, topical, or inhalational formulations are available. Its use in other species—including reptiles, birds, rodents, and wildlife—is off-label and requires cascade or extralabel justification. All currently marketed products contain alfaxalone solubilised in 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, enhancing water solubility and reducing the adverse effects seen in older Cremophor-based formulations.

European Union

  • Tablets: No alfaxalone tablets are authorised. Oral bioavailability is negligible due to extensive first-pass metabolism and low enteric absorption (Maddison et al., 2008).

  • Oral Suspensions: No veterinary or human oral suspensions exist. Alfaxalone is not formulated for enteral use.

  • Injectables: Alfaxan® Multidose (10 mg/mL) is authorised in the EU for IV use in dogs and cats under mutual recognition and decentralised procedures. It contains alfaxalone solubilised with 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and a preservative system allowing multidose vial use for up to 28 days. Use in rabbits, reptiles, and birds is common under cascade regulations, supported by published evidence on safety and efficacy (McMillan et al., 2018; Di Girolamo and Selleri, 2016).

  • Other Formulations: No topical or inhaled veterinary formulations are available. Intramuscular administration, while off-label, is routinely employed in exotic species with demonstrated clinical utility (Carpenter and Marion, 2018).

United Kingdom

  • Tablets: No oral formulations are licensed.

  • Oral Suspensions: Not marketed or compounded due to lack of efficacy by the enteral route.

  • Injectables: Alfaxan® Multidose (10 mg/mL) is licensed in the UK for IV induction of anaesthesia in dogs, cats, and pet (non-food) rabbits (Vm 51657/4002). This is the only licensed use in rabbits and represents a critical exemption from cascade requirements for this species. The formulation permits repeated dosing from a single vial over 28 days when stored appropriately (VMD, 2025).

  • Other Formulations: No alternative route or species-specific formulations are marketed in the UK. Use in birds, reptiles, rodents, and other exotic animals remains off-label under Schedule 4 of the Veterinary Medicines Regulations.

  • SAES Products: No alfaxalone-containing products are registered under the Small Animal Exemption Scheme (SAES). Use in non-authorised species (e.g., chelonians, ferrets, birds) must follow the cascade, using authorised formulations and appropriate clinical justification (VMD, 2025).

United States

  • Tablets: Not available or clinically appropriate.

  • Oral Suspensions: No US-approved oral formulations exist, and enteral use is not supported.

  • Injectables: Alfaxan® (10 mg/mL) is FDA-approved under NADA 141-529 for IV induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in dogs and cats. The formulation uses 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and benzethonium chloride as a preservative. Extralabel use under AMDUCA is permitted in exotic species such as rabbits, reptiles, and birds, where IM administration is commonly used (FDA, 2023; AVMA, 2020).

  • Other Formulations: No topical, oral, or inhalational formulations of alfaxalone are available in the US. Human medical use is not authorised.

  • Common Name: Alfaxalone

  • Systematic Name: 11-oxo-3α,5α-tetrahydroprogesterone; 5α-pregnan-3α-ol-11,20-dione; 3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnane-11,20-dione (PubChem, 2024)

  • Chemical Formula: C₂₁H₃₂O₃ (PubChem, 2024)

  • Molecular Weight: 332.5 g/mol (PubChem, 2024)

  • Synonyms: Alfaxalonum (INN-Latin), Alfaxan®, Alphaxalone, Althesin® (when combined with alfadolone) (PubChem, 2024; WHO INN, 2024)

  • CAS Number: 4979-32-2 (PubChem, 2024)

  • PubChem CID: 102146 (PubChem, 2024)

  • UNII (FDA): 7V7R6599Y5 (FDA Substance Registration System, 2024)

  • InChI Key: SMLBHJSEMVJFDU-FBLMJIEOSA-N (PubChem, 2024)

  • ATC Code: N01AX05 (WHO, 2024)

  • ATCvet Code: QN01AX05 (WHO, 2024)

  • Pharmacotherapeutic Group: General anaesthetics – Neuroactive steroid anaesthetic (WHO, 2024; EMA, 2024). Alfaxalone is a pregnane steroid derived from progesterone.

  • MeSH Terms: Alfaxalone; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Steroids; Neurosteroids; GABA Modulators (PubChem, 2024; NLM MeSH, 2024)

  1. Abstracts presented at the 10th World Congress of Veterinary Anaesthesia, 31st August–4th September 2009, Glasgow, UK, 2010. . Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 37, 1–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00535a.x

  2. Al Kafaji, T., Corda, A., Charalambous, M., Murgia, E., Tartari, I., Puci, M., Debidda, P., Gallucci, A., 2024. Efficacy and safety of alfaxalone compared to propofol in canine refractory status epilepticus: a pilot study. Front Vet Sci 11, 1383439. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1383439

  3. Albertson, T.E., Walby, W.F., Joy, R.M., 1992. Modification of GABA-mediated Inhibition by Various Injectable Anesthetics. Anesthesiology 77, 488–499. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199209000-00014

  4. Alfaxalone - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/alfaxalone (accessed 8.13.25).

  5. Alfaxan Multidose 10 mg/ml Solution for Injection for Dogs, Cats and Pet Rabbits [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.vmd.defra.gov.uk/productinformationdatabase/product/A009853 (accessed 2.12.24).

  6. Allerton, F., 2023. BSAVA Small Animal Formulary - Part a: Canine and Feline, 11th ed. ed. British Small Animal Veterinary Association (B S A V A), Gloucester.

  7. Almeida, D., Kennedy, M., Wendt-Hornickle, E., 2022. Snake Sedation and Anesthesia. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 25, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2021.08.003

  8. Alvarez-Sanchez, A., Townsend, K.L., LeBlanc, N.L., Milovancev, M., Scollan, K.F., Heatley, J., Hoppes, S., Saunders, A.B., Gordon, S.G., Pesce, K., Swift, S.T., Brenner, E., Thomason, J.D., Eshar, D., 2022. Epicardial pacemaker implantation and outcome in eight pet ferrets (Mustela putorius furo). Journal of Veterinary Cardiology 41, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvc.2022.01.005

  9. Applegate, J.R., Harms, C.A., 2023. Chapter 11 - Ferrets, in: Carpenter, J., Harms, C. (Eds.), Carpenter’s Exotic Animal Formulary (Sixth Edition). W.B. Saunders, New Delhi, pp. 626–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-83392-9.00011-3

  10. Avelino, J.A., Walsh, C.A., Wharton, K.N., Ekanayake, D., Ekanayake-Alper, D., 2024. A Comparison of Three Anesthetic Drug Combinations for Use in Inducing Surgical Anesthesia in Female Guinea Pigs (Cavia porcellus). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 63, 182–189. https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000064

  11. Balko, J.A., Chinnadurai, S.K., 2017. Advancements in Evidence-Based Anesthesia of Exotic Animals. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 20, 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2017.04.014

  12. Balko, J.A., Gatson, B.J., Cohen, E.B., Griffith, E.H., Harms, C.A., Bailey, K.M., 2018. INHALANT ANESTHETIC RECOVERY FOLLOWING INTRAMUSCULAR EPINEPHRINE IN THE LOGGERHEAD SEA TURTLE ( CARETTA CARETTA). J Zoo Wildl Med 49, 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1638/2017-0182.1

  13. Barr, C.A., 2026. Chapter 19 - Anesthesia of the Cardiac Patient, in: Tilley, L.P., Smith, F.W.K., Sleeper, M.M., Kraus, M.S. (Eds.), Manual of Canine and Feline Cardiology (Sixth Edition). W.B. Saunders, pp. 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-93659-0.00019-9

  14. Bauer, B.S., Ambros, B., 2016. The effects of intravenous alfaxalone with and without premedication on intraocular pressure in healthy dogs. Can J Vet Res 80, 156–161.

  15. Bayldon, W., Carter, J.E., Beths, T., Warne, L.N., Whittem, T., Martinez, L., Bauquier, S.H., 2016. Accidental alfaxalone overdose in a mature cat undergoing anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery Open Reports 2, 2055116916647740. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055116916647740

  16. Bennett, K., Lewis, K., 2022. Sedation and Anesthesia in Rodents. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 25, 211–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2021.08.013

  17. Bennett, R.C., Salla, K.M., Raekallio, M.R., Scheinin, M., Vainio, O.M., 2017. Effects of the α2-adrenoceptor agonist medetomidine on the distribution and clearance of alfaxalone during coadministration by constant rate infusion in dogs. Am J Vet Res 78, 956–964. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.78.8.956

  18. Bertelsen, M.F., Sauer, C.D., 2011. Alfaxalone anaesthesia in the green iguana (Iguana iguana). Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 38, 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00640.x

  19. Beths, T., Touzot-Jourde, G., Musk, G., Pasloske, K., 2014. Clinical evaluation of alfaxalone to induce and maintain anaesthesia in cats undergoing neutering procedures. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 16, 609–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X13514420

  20. Boothe, D.M., 2012. Small animal clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2. ed. ed. Elsevier Saunders, St. Louis, Mo.

  21. Bradley, M.P., Doerning, C.M., Nowland, M.H., Lester, P.A., 2019. Intramuscular Administration of Alfaxalone Alone and in Combination for Sedation and Anesthesia of Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 58, 216–222. https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000078

  22. Bradley, M.P., Doerning, C.M., Nowland, M.H., Pasloske, K., Lester, P.A., 2022. Evaluation of alfaxalone total intravenous anesthesia in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) premedicated with dexmedetomidine or dexmedetomidine and buprenorphine. Vet Anaesth Analg S1467-2987(22)00013–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2022.01.006

  23. Branquart, M., Langlois, I., Vachon, C., Dunn, M., 2023. Removal of lower urinary tract stones by percutaneous cystolithotomy in domestic male ferrets (Mustela putorius furo): four cases (2017–2020). Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 45, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jepm.2023.02.008

  24. Bustamante, R., Ortiz-Díez, G., Canfrán, S., Gómez de Segura, I.A., Aguado, D., 2024. A survey on the use of total intravenous anaesthesia in small animals by veterinary anaesthesiologists. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 51, 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2024.09.003

  25. Calero Rodriguez, A., van Zeeland, Y.R., Schoemaker, N.J., de Grauw, J.C., 2021. Agreement between invasive and oscillometric arterial blood pressure measurement using a high-definition oscillometric device in normotensive New Zealand White rabbits using two different anaesthetic protocols. Vet Anaesth Analg 48, 679–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2021.03.016

  26. Campagna, I., Schwarz, A., Keller, S., Bettschart-Wolfensberger, R., Mosing, M., 2015. Comparison of the effects of propofol or alfaxalone for anaesthesia induction and maintenance on respiration in cats. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 42, 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12231

  27. Cantwell, S.L., 2001. Ferret, rabbit, and rodent anesthesia. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 4, 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1094-9194(17)30056-7

  28. Carpenter, J.W., Harms, C.A. (Eds.), 2023. Carpenter’s Exotic Animal Formulary, Sixth edition. ed. Elsevier, St. Louis, Missouri.

  29. Chen, K., Keating, S., Strahl-Heldreth, D., Clark-Price, S., 2020. Effects of intracoelomic alfaxalone-dexmedetomidine on righting reflex in common garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis): preliminary data. Vet Anaesth Analg 47, 793–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2020.08.002

  30. Child, K.J., Davis, B., Dodds, M.G., Twissell, D.J., 1972. Anaesthetic, cardiovascular and respiratory effects of a new steroidal agent CT 1341. Br J Pharmacol 46, 189–200.

  31. Chiu, K.W., Robson, S., Devi, J.L., Woodward, A., Whittem, T., 2016. The cardiopulmonary effects and quality of anesthesia after induction with alfaxalone in 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin in dogs and cats: a systematic review. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 39, 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12312

  32. Coutant, T., Vergneau-Grosset, C., Langlois, I., 2018. Overview of Drug Delivery Methods in Exotics, Including Their Anatomic and Physiologic Considerations. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 21, 215–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2018.01.006

  33. Cruz-Benedetti, I.-C., Bublot, I., Ribas, T., Fourel, I., Vogl, C., Dubois, C., Milani, M., Ida, K.K., Portier, K., 2018. Pharmacokinetics of intramuscular alfaxalone and its echocardiographic, cardiopulmonary and sedative effects in healthy dogs. PLoS One 13, e0204553. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204553

  34. Davies, J.A., 2007. Alphaxalone, in: Enna, S.J., Bylund, D.B. (Eds.), xPharm: The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference. Elsevier, New York, pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008055232-3.61199-7

  35. Dehuisser, V., Bosmans, T., Devreese, M., Gehring, R., Croubels, S., Duchateau, L., Polis, I., 2019. Alfaxalone total intravenous anaesthesia in dogs: pharmacokinetics, cardiovascular data and recovery characteristics. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 46, 605–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2019.04.014

  36. Divers, S., Stahl, S. (Eds.), 2019. Mader’s Reptile and Amphibian Medicine and Surgery, Elsevier Enhanced Digital Version, 2019-01-14.  VitalBook file., 3rd Edition. ed.

  37. Doss, G., De Miguel Garcia, C., 2022. African Pygmy Hedgehog (Atelerix albiventris) and Sugar Glider (Petaurus breviceps) Sedation and Anesthesia. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 25, 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2021.08.005

  38. Doss, G.A., Fink, D.M., Sladky, K.K., Mans, C., 2017. Comparison of subcutaneous dexmedetomidine-midazolam versus alfaxalone-midazolam sedation in leopard geckos (Eublepharis macularius). Vet Anaesth Analg 44, 1175–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2017.03.007

  39. Eatwell, K., 2010. Options for analgesia and anaesthesia in reptiles. In Practice 32, 306–311. https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.c3917

  40. Effect of choline chloride premedication on xylazine-induced hypoxaemia in sheep - Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.vaajournal.org/article/S1467-2987(17)30081-8/abstract (accessed 9.25.25).

  41. Engbers, S., Larkin, A., Rousset, N., Prebble, M., Jonnalagadda, M., Knight, C.G., Pang, D.S.J., 2017. Comparison of a Supraglottic Airway Device (v-gel®) with Blind Orotracheal Intubation in Rabbits. Front Vet Sci 4, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00049

  42. Ettinger, S.J., 2024. Textbook of veterinary internal medicine: 9th Edition. Diseases of the dog and the cat and  (Côté, E) Elsevier Enhanced Digital Version, 2024-02-08.  VitalBook file. Elsevier, St. Louis, Missouri.

  43. Ettinger, S.J., 2017. Textbook of veterinary internal medicine: 8th Edition Diseases of the dog and the cat and Elsevier Enhanced Digital Version.  Available from: vbk://9780323462129, Eighth edition. ed. Elsevier, St. Louis, Missouri.

  44. Fernández Castañer, J., Quirós Carmona, S., Martínez Bernal, C., Morgaz Rodríguez, J., Navarrete Calvo, R., Granados Machuca, M. del M., 2023. Sedation Quality and Cardiorespiratory, Echocardiographic, Radiographic and Electrocardiographic Effects of Intramuscular Alfaxalone and Butorphanol in Spanish Greyhound Dogs. Animals (Basel) 13, 2937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182937

  45. Fernandez-Parra, R., Zilberstein, L., Fontaine, C., Adami, C., 2017. Comparison of intratesticular lidocaine, sacrococcygeal epidural lidocaine and intravenous methadone in cats undergoing castration: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blind clinical trial. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 44, 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2016.03.010

  46. Ferré, P.J., Pasloske, K., Whittem, T., Ranasinghe, M.G., Li, Q., Lefebvre, H.P., 2006. Plasma pharmacokinetics of alfaxalone in dogs after an intravenous bolus of Alfaxan-CD RTU. Vet Anaesth Analg 33, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00264.x

  47. Ferreira, T.H., Mans, C., 2022. Sedation and Anesthesia of Lizards. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 25, 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2021.08.002

  48. Flecknell, P., 2016. Chapter 3 - Special Techniques, in: Flecknell, P. (Ed.), Laboratory Animal Anaesthesia (Fourth Edition). Academic Press, Boston, pp. 109–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800036-6.00003-X

  49. Garbin, M., Pablo, L.S., Alexander, A.B., 2021. Management of hyperkalemia and associated complications in a ferret (Mustela putorius furo) with urinary obstruction requiring surgery. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 39, 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jepm.2021.05.007

  50. Gardhouse, S., Sanchez, A., 2022. Rabbit Sedation and Anesthesia. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 25, 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2021.08.012

  51. Ghaffari, M.S., Moghaddassi, A.P., 2010. Effects of ketamine-diazepam and ketamine-acepromazine combinations on intraocular pressure in rabbits. Vet Anaesth Analg 37, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00531.x

  52. Giannettoni, G., Moretti, G., Menchetti, L., Pepe, A., Bellocchi, F., Bufalari, A., Nannarone, S., 2022. Sedation quality of alfaxalone associated with butorphanol, methadone or pethidine in cats injected into the supraspinatus or the quadriceps muscle. J Feline Med Surg 24, e269–e280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X221104747

  53. Gil, A.G., Silván, G., Villa, A., Illera, J.C., 2012. Heart and respiratory rates and adrenal response to propofol or alfaxalone in rabbits. Vet Rec 170, 444. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.100573

  54. Giral, M., García-Olmo, D.C., Gómez-Juárez, M., Gómez de Segura, I.A., 2014. Anaesthetic effects in the ferret of alfaxalone alone and in combination with medetomidine or tramadol: a pilot study. Lab Anim 48, 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677214539150

  55. Green, C.J., Halsey, M.J., Precious, S., Wardley-Smith, B., 1978. Alphaxolone-alphadolone anaesthesia in laboratory animals. Lab Anim 12, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367778780953206

  56. Grint, N.J., Smith, H.E., Senior, J.M., 2008. Clinical evaluation of alfaxalone in cyclodextrin for the induction of anaesthesia in rabbits. Vet Rec 163, 395–396. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.163.13.395

  57. Grubb, T.L., Greene, S.A., Perez, T.E., 2013. Cardiovascular and respiratory effects, and quality of anesthesia produced by alfaxalone administered intramuscularly to cats sedated with dexmedetomidine and hydromorphone. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 15, 858–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X13478265

  58. Guo, Y., Mao, S., Zhou, Z., 2024. Effects of intramuscular alfaxalone and dexmedetomidine alone and combined on ocular, electroretinographic, and cardiorespiratory parameters in normal cats. Front Vet Sci 11, 1407928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1407928

  59. Hansen, L.L., Bertelsen, M.F., 2013. Assessment of the effects of intramuscular administration of alfaxalone with and without medetomidine in Horsfield’s tortoises (Agrionemys horsfieldii). Vet Anaesth Analg 40, e68-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12045

  60. Harrison, N.L., Simmonds, M.A., 1984. Modulation of the GABA receptor complex by a steroid anaesthetic. Brain Research 323, 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(84)90299-3

  61. Hawkins, M.G., Griffenhagen, G.M., 2022. Raptor Sedation and Anesthesia. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 25, 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2021.08.011

  62. Hawkins, S.J., Doss, G.A., Mans, C., 2020. Evaluation of subcutaneous administration of alfaxalone-midazolam and ketamine-midazolam as sedation protocols in African pygmy hedgehogs (Atelerix albiventris). https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.257.8.820

  63. Hedley, J., 2023. BSAVA Small Animal Formulary - Part B: Exotic Pets, 11th ed. ed. British Small Animal Veterinary Association (B S A V A), Gloucester.

  64. Herbert, G.L., Murison, P.J., 2013. Eye position of cats anaesthetised with alfaxalone or propofol. Veterinary Record 172, 365–365. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.101404

  65. Hobbs, B.A., Rolhall, T.G., Sprenkel, T.L., Anthony, K.L., 1991. Comparison of several combinations for anesthesia in rabbits. Am J Vet Res 52, 669–674.

  66. Hofmeister, E.H., Steagall, P., Love, L., Reed, R., Cremer, J., 2025. Veterinary anesthesia curricula beliefs and practices. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 52, 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2024.12.001

  67. Huynh, M., Poumeyrol, S., Pignon, C., Le Teuff, G., Zilberstein, L., 2015. Intramuscular administration of alfaxalone for sedation in rabbits. Vet Rec 176, 255. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.102522

  68. Innis, C., DeVoe, R., 2010. A CALL FOR ADDITIONAL STUDY OF THE SAFETY OF SUBCARAPACIAL VENIPUNCTURE IN CHELONIANS. 2010 Proceedings Association of Reptilian and Amphibian Veterinarians.

  69. Ishikawa, Y., Sakata, H., Tachibana, Y., Itami, T., Oyama, N., Umar, M.A., Sano, T., Yamashita, K., 2019. Sedative and physiological effects of low-dose intramuscular alfaxalone in rabbits. J Vet Med Sci 81, 851–856. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.18-0618

  70. Jirkof, P., Lofgren, J., 2023. Anesthesia and analgesia in laboratory rodents, in: Anesthesia and Analgesia in Laboratory Animals. Elsevier, pp. 287–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822215-7.00007-X

  71. Johnson-Delaney, C., Lennox, A., 2023. Chapter 21 - Analgesia and anesthesia in ferrets, in: Dyson, M.C., Jirkof, P., Lofgren, J., Nunamaker, E.A., Pang, D. (Eds.), Anesthesia and Analgesia in Laboratory Animals (Third Edition), American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822215-7.00026-3

  72. Jones, K.L., 2012. Therapeutic Review: Alfaxalone. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, Emergency Presentation of Exotic Mammal Herbivores 21, 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jepm.2012.09.011

  73. Kapaldo, N., Eshar, D., 2022. Ferret Sedation and Anesthesia. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 25, 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2021.08.006

  74. Keates, H., Whittem, T., 2012. Effect of intravenous dose escalation with alfaxalone and propofol on occurrence of apnoea in the dog. Research in Veterinary Science 93, 904–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.10.003

  75. Kerr, C.L., Swanton, W.E., Johnson, R.J., Amezcua, M.D., O’Sullivan, T.L., 2025. Anesthetic and analgesic management of cats undergoing elective neutering: survey of practices and opinions of veterinarians in Ontario, Canada. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2025.09.002

  76. Khenissi, L., Nikolayenkova-Topie, O., Broussaud, S., Touzot-Jourde, G., 2017. Comparison of intramuscular alfaxalone and ketamine combined with dexmedetomidine and butorphanol for castration in cats. J Feline Med Surg 19, 791–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X16657951

  77. Kim, B., Jang, M., Sohn, J., Oh, H., Jo, S., Choi, M., Lee, I., Yoon, J., 2019. Effects of Intramuscular Alfaxalone/Acepromazine on Echocardiographic, Biochemical, and Blood Gas Measurements in Healthy Cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 55, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6630

  78. Kischinovsky, M., Duse, A., Wang, T., Bertelsen, M.F., 2013. Intramuscular administration of alfaxalone in red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans) – effects of dose and body temperature. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 40, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2012.00745.x

  79. Knotek, Z., 2014. Alfaxalone as an induction agent for anaesthesia in terrapins and tortoises. Veterinary Record 175, 327–327. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.102486

  80. Knutson, K.A., Petritz, O.A., Thomson, A.E., Balko, J.A., 2022. Intramuscular Alfaxalone-Butorphanol-Midazolam Compared with Ketamine-Butorphanol- Midazolam in New Zealand White Rabbits. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 61, 475–481. https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000038

  81. Körner, M., Rohrer Bley, C., Bektas, R., Riond, B., Wolf, F., Meier, V., 2023. Comparison of alfaxalone and propofol on haematological and serum biochemical variables in cats undergoing radiotherapy with sevoflurane maintenance. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 50, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2022.11.010

  82. Lagos-Carvajal, A., Queiroz-Williams, P., Cremer, J., Ricco Pereira, C.H., Nevarez, J., Da Cunha, A.F., Liu, C.-C., 2020. Effects of a priming dose of alfaxalone on the total anesthetic induction dose for and cardiorespiratory function of sedated healthy cats. ajvr 81, 850–855. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.81.11.850

  83. Lau, C., Ranasinghe, M.G., Shiels, I., Keates, H., Pasloske, K., Bellingham, M.C., 2013. Plasma pharmacokinetics of alfaxalone after a single intraperitoneal or intravenous injection of Alfaxan(®) in rats. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 36, 516–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12055

  84. Lipman, N.S., Marini, R.P., Erdman, S.E., 1990. A comparison of ketamine/xylazine and ketamine/xylazine/acepromazine anesthesia in the rabbit. Lab Anim Sci 40, 395–398.

  85. Little, S.E., 2025. Chapter 7 - Principles of Anesthesia, in: Little, S.E. (Ed.), THE CAT (Second Edition). Elsevier, Philadelphia (PA), pp. 160-209.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-49687-2.00007-2

  86. Lo, E.J.Y., Villamil, C.S., Hannabuss, J., Morey, A.G.N., 2025. Epicardial pacemaker implantation in a young cat with sick sinus syndrome. Journal of Veterinary Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvc.2025.09.003

  87. Ludders, J.W., Thomas, C.B., Sharp, P., Sedgwick, C.J., 1987. An anesthetic technique for repeated collection of blood from New Zealand White rabbits. Laboratory animal science (USA).

  88. Maddison, J.E., Page, S.W., Church, D. (Eds.), 2008. Small animal clinical pharmacology, 2nd ed. ed. Saunders/Elsevier, Edinburgh ; New York.

  89. Maguire, S., Hawk, C.T., 2012. Chapter 55 - Formulary, in: Suckow, M.A., Stevens, K.A., Wilson, R.P. (Eds.), The Laboratory Rabbit, Guinea Pig, Hamster, and Other Rodents, American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine. Academic Press, Boston, pp. 1193–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-380920-9.00055-9

  90. Manire, C.A., 2017. Sea Turtle Health and Rehabilitation. J. Ross Publishing, Plantation, FL.

  91. Manire, C.A., Norton, T.M., Stacy, B.A., Innis, C.J., Harms, C.A., 2017. Sea Turtle: Therapeutics and Formulary, in: Sea Turtle Health and Rehabilitation Chapter 21 P497-526 & Therapeutics and Appendix 7 Sea Turtle Formulary P987-992. J. Ross Publishing, Plantation, FL, pp. 497–526 & 987–992.

  92. Marsh, M.K., McLeod, S.R., Hansen, A., Maloney, S.K., 2009. Induction of anaesthesia in wild rabbits using a new alfaxalone formulation. Vet Rec 164, 122–123. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.164.4.122

  93. Martín Bellido, V., Vettorato, E., 2022. Clinical review of the pharmacological and anaesthetic effects of alfaxalone in dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice 63, 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13454

  94. Martinez Taboada, F., Murison, P.J., 2010. Induction of anaesthesia with alfaxalone or propofol before isoflurane maintenance in cats. Veterinary Record 167, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.b4872

  95. Mathis, A., Pinelas, R., Brodbelt, D.C., Alibhai, H.I., 2012. Comparison of quality of recovery from anaesthesia in cats induced with propofol or alfaxalone. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 39, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00707.x

  96. Mazzaferro, V., Makowka, L., Enrichens, F., Kahn, D., Ferla, G., Banner, B., Olivero, G., Selby, R.R., Stevenson, W.C., Todo, S., 1989. A modified technique of orthotopic transplant of the kidney in rabbits. J Invest Surg 2, 293–303. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941938909057435

  97. McArthur, S., Wilkinson, R., Meyer, J., 2004. Medicine and surgery of tortoises and turtles. Blackwell Pub, Oxford, UK ; Ames, Iowa.

  98. McMillan, M.W., Leece, E.A., 2011. Immersion and branchial/transcutaneous irrigation anaesthesia with alfaxalone in a Mexican axolotl. Vet Anaesth Analg 38, 619–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00660.x

  99. Milloway, M., Posner, L., Balko, J., 2019. Sedative and cardiorespiratory effects of intramuscular alfaxalone and butorphanol at two doses in ferrets (Mustela putorius furo). Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 46, 831.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2019.08.032

  100. Milloway, M.C., Posner, L.P., Balko, J.A., 2021. SEDATIVE AND CARDIORESPIRATORY EFFECTS OF INTRAMUSCULAR ALFAXALONE AND BUTORPHANOL AT TWO DOSAGES IN FERRETS (MUSTELA PUTORIUS FURO). J Zoo Wildl Med 51, 841–847. https://doi.org/10.1638/2019-0241

  101. Miziak, B., Chrościńska-Krawczyk, M., Czuczwar, S.J., 2020. Neurosteroids and Seizure Activity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 11, 541802. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.541802

  102. Molter, C., Escobar, A., Schroeder, C., 2022. Backyard Poultry and Waterfowl Sedation and Anesthesia. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 25, 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2021.08.004

  103. Muir, W., Lerche, P., Wiese, A., Nelson, L., Pasloske, K., Whittem, T., 2009. The cardiorespiratory and anesthetic effects of clinical and supraclinical doses of alfaxalone in cats. Vet Anaesth Analg 36, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2008.00428.x

  104. Muir, W., Lerche, P., Wiese, A., Nelson, L., Pasloske, K., Whittem, T., 2008. Cardiorespiratory and anesthetic effects of clinical and supraclinical doses of alfaxalone in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 35, 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2008.00406.x

  105. Murdock, M.A., Pereira, C.H.R., Aarnes, T.K., Cremer, J., Lerche, P., Bednarski, R.M., 2020. Sedative and cardiorespiratory effects of intramuscular administration of alfaxalone and butorphanol combined with acepromazine, midazolam, or dexmedetomidine in dogs. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.81.1.65

  106. Murison, P.J., Taboada, F.M., 2010. Effect of propofol and alfaxalone on pain after ovariohysterectomy in cats. Veterinary Record 166, 334–335. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.b4788

  107. Najman, I.E., Ferreira, J.Z., Abimussi, C.J.X., Floriano, B.P., Meneghetti, T.M., Oliva, V.N.L.S., do Nascimento, P., 2015. Ultrasound-assisted periconal ocular blockade in rabbits. Vet Anaesth Analg 42, 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12237

  108. Navarrete-Calvo, R., Gómez-Villamandos, R.J., Morgaz, J., Manuel Domínguez, J., Fernández-Sarmiento, A., Muñoz-Rascón, P., López Villalba, I., Del Mar Granados, M., 2014. Cardiorespiratory, anaesthetic and recovery effects of morphine combined with medetomidine and alfaxalone in rabbits. Vet Rec 174, 95. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.101293

  109. Neiffer, D.L., Hayek, L.-A.C., Conyers, D., Daneault, A., Sincage, J., Yawn, J., 2021. COMPARISON OF SUBCARAPACIAL SINUS AND BRACHIAL VEIN PHLEBOTOMY SITES FOR BLOOD COLLECTION IN FREE-RANGING GOPHER TORTOISES (GOPHERUS POLYPHEMUS). zamd 52, 966–974. https://doi.org/10.1638/2020-0190

  110. Nelissen, P., Corletto, F., Aprea, F., White, R.A.S., 2012. Effect of Three Anesthetic Induction Protocols on Laryngeal Motion during Laryngoscopy in Normal Cats. Veterinary Surgery 41, 876–883. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2012.01030.x

  111. O’Hagan, B., Pasloske, K., McKinnon, C., Perkins, N., Whittem, T., 2012. Clinical evaluation of alfaxalone as an anaesthetic induction agent in cats less than 12 weeks of age. Australian Veterinary Journal 90, 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.00983.x

  112. Pasloske, K., Sauer, B., Perkins, N., Whittem, T., 2009. Plasma pharmacokinetics of alfaxalone in both premedicated and unpremedicated Greyhound dogs after single, intravenous administration of Alfaxan at a clinical dose. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 32, 510–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2009.01070.x

  113. Phillips, B.E., Posner, L.P., Lewbart, G.A., Christiansen, E.F., Harms, C.A., 2017. Effects of alfaxalone administered intravenously to healthy yearling loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) at three different doses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 250, 909–917. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.250.8.909

  114. Pypendop, B.H., Ranasinghe, M.G., Pasloske, K., 2018a. Comparison of two intravenous anesthetic infusion regimens for alfaxalone in cats. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 45, 459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2018.03.003

  115. Pypendop, B.H., Siao, K.T., Ranasinghe, M.G., Pasloske, K., 2018b. Effective plasma alfaxalone concentration to produce immobility in male neutered cats. Vet Anaesth Analg 45, 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2017.10.006

  116. Quesenberry, K.E. (Ed.), 2021. Ferrets, rabbits, and rodents: clinical medicine and surgery, Fourth edition. ed. Elsevier, St. Louis, Missouri.

  117. Quirós-Carmona, S., Navarrete, R., Domínguez, J.M., Granados, M.D.M., Gómez-Villamandos, R.J., Muñoz-Rascón, P., Aguilar, D., Funes, F.J., Morgaz, J., 2017. A comparison of cardiopulmonary effects and anaesthetic requirements of two dexmedetomidine continuous rate infusions in alfaxalone-anaesthetized Greyhounds. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 44, 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2016.03.004

  118. Ramoo, S., Bradbury, L., Anderson, G., Abraham, L., 2013. Sedation of hyperthyroid cats with subcutaneous administration of a combination of alfaxalone and butorphanol. Australian Veterinary Journal 91, 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12034

  119. Raulic, J., Leung, V.S., Doss, G.A., Graham, J.E., Keller, K.A., Mans, C., Sadar, M.J., Vergneau-Grosset, C., Pang, D.S., 2021. Development and Testing of a Sedation Scale for Use in Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 60, 549–555. https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000002

  120. Reabel, S.N., Queiroz-Williams, P., Cremer, J., Hampton, C.E., Liu, C.-C., da Cunha, A., Nevarez, J.G., 2021. Assessment of intramuscular administration of three doses of alfaxalone combined with hydromorphone and dexmedetomidine for endoscopic-guided orotracheal intubation in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J Am Vet Med Assoc 259, 1148–1153. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.20.07.0402

  121. Reabel, S.N., Queiroz-Williams, P., Cremer, J., Langohr, I.M., da Cunha, A.F., Hampton, C.E., Carossino, M., Liu, C.-C., Nevarez, J.G., 2022. Comparison of blind and endoscopic-guided orotracheal intubation on laryngeal and tracheal damage in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 49, 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2022.04.003

  122. Roan, R., 2009. Use of alfaxalone in rabbits. Vet Rec 164, 188. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.164.6.188-a

  123. Robertson, S.A., 2020. Pharmacologic Methods: An Update on Optimal Presedation and Euthanasia Solution Administration. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, Small Animal Euthanasia: Updates on Clinical Practice 50, 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2019.12.004

  124. Rockwell, K., Boykin, K., Padlo, J., Ford, C., Aschebrock, S., Mitchell, M., 2021. Evaluating the efficacy of alfaxalone in corn snakes (Pantherophis guttatus). Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 48, 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2021.01.004

  125. Rodrigo-Mocholí, D., Belda, E., Bosmans, T., Laredo, F.G., 2016. Clinical efficacy and cardiorespiratory effects of intramuscular administration of alfaxalone alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine in cats. Vet Anaesth Analg 43, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12304

  126. Rodrigo-Mocholí, D., Escudero, E., Belda, E., Laredo, F.G., Hernandis, V., Marín, P., 2018. Pharmacokinetics and effects of alfaxalone after intravenous and intramuscular administration to cats. N Z Vet J 66, 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2018.1455541

  127. Rousseau-Blass, F., Pang, D.S., 2020. Hypoventilation following oxygen administration associated with alfaxalone-dexmedetomidine-midazolam anesthesia in New Zealand White rabbits. Vet Anaesth Analg 47, 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2020.04.012

  128. Ryan, A.C., Dutton, T.A.G., Gurney, M.A., 2022. Peribulbar block in a rabbit presenting for enucleation. Veterinary Record Case Reports n/a, e359. https://doi.org/10.1002/vrc2.359

  129. Sabater González, M., Adami, C., 2022. Psittacine Sedation and Anesthesia. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 25, 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2021.08.010

  130. Scarabelli, S., Di Girolamo, N., 2022. Chelonian Sedation and Anesthesia. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 25, 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2021.08.009

  131. Schwarz, A., Kalchofner, K., Palm, J., Picek, S., Hartnack, S., Bettschart-Wolfensberger, R., 2014. Minimum infusion rate of alfaxalone for total intravenous anaesthesia after sedation with acepromazine or medetomidine in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Vet Anaesth Analg 41, 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12144

  132. Shilo-Benjamini, Y., Pe’er, O., Abu Ahmad, W., Ofri, R., 2023. Effect of anesthetic induction with propofol, alfaxalone or ketamine on intraocular pressure in cats: a randomized masked clinical investigation. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 50, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2022.11.005

  133. Silverstein, D.C., Hopper, K. (Eds.), 2009. Small animal critical care medicine. Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis, Mo.

  134. Smith, J.S., Seddighi, R., 2022. Miniature Companion Pig Sedation and Anesthesia. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice, Sedation and Anesthesia of Zoological Companion Animals 25, 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2021.08.007

  135. Smith, M., 2022. Textbook of Rabbit Medicine,  3rd Edition, Elsevier Limited.  Available from: vbk://9780702084041.

  136. Smith, W., 1993. Responses of laboratory animals to some injectable anaesthetics. Lab Anim 27, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367793781082377

  137. Spaar Weiss, M.R., Hutt, J.P., Stewart, S.D., Volker, M.K., 2025. Risk factors associated with increased mortality within 14 days of general anesthesia in specialty veterinary dentistry and oral surgery practices. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 52, 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2025.04.004

  138. Strahl-Heldreth, D.E., Clark-Price, S.C., Keating, S.C.J., Escalante, G.C., Graham, L.F., Chinnadurai, S.K., Schaeffer, D.J., 2019. Effect of intracoelomic administration of alfaxalone on the righting reflex and tactile stimulus response of common garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis). Am J Vet Res 80, 144–151. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.80.2.144

  139. TAMURA, J., ISHIZUKA, T., FUKUI, S., OYAMA, N., KAWASE, K., ITAMI, T., MIYOSHI, K., SANO, T., PASLOSKE, K., YAMASHITA, K., 2015a. Sedative effects of intramuscular alfaxalone administered to cats. J Vet Med Sci 77, 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.14-0200

  140. TAMURA, J., ISHIZUKA, T., FUKUI, S., OYAMA, N., KAWASE, K., MIYOSHI, K., SANO, T., PASLOSKE, K., YAMASHITA, K., 2015b. The pharmacological effects of the anesthetic alfaxalone after intramuscular administration to dogs. J Vet Med Sci 77, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.14-0368

  141. Te Poele, E., De Vries, A., De Grauw, J., 2025. Sedative effects of intramuscular alfaxalone–methadone–midazolam versus ketamine–methadone–midazolam in cats. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 52, 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2024.10.130

  142. Trenholme, H.N., 2023. Sedation and Anesthesia in Exotic Animal Critical Care. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 26, 591–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2023.05.003

  143. Tutunaru, A.C., Sonea, A., Drion, P., Serteyn, D., Sandersen, C., 2013. Anaesthetic induction with alfaxalone may produce hypoxemia in rabbits premedicated with fentanyl/droperidol. Vet Anaesth Analg 40, 657–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12071

  144. van Zeeland, Y., Schoemaker, N., n.d. Current anaesthetic considerations and techniques in rabbits.

  145. Vandenbruggen, J., Ambros, B., Beaufrère, H., Desprez, I., 2025. Comparison of Three Sedation Protocols Using Midazolam and Opioids in Domestic Ferrets (Mustela Putorius Furo). Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jepm.2025.09.017

  146. Vettorato, E., 2013. Prolonged intravenous infusion of alfaxalone in a cat. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 40, 551–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12044

  147. Visser, M., Oster, S.C., 2018. The Educated Guess. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 21, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2018.01.002

  148. Warne, L.N., Beths, T., Whittem, T., Carter, J.E., Bauquier, S.H., 2015. A review of the pharmacology and clinical application of alfaxalone in cats. The Veterinary Journal 203, 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.12.011

  149. Webb, J.K., Keller, K.A., Chinnadurai, S.K., Kadotani, S., Allender, M.C., Fries, R., 2023. Use of alfaxalone in bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps): optimizing pharmacodynamics and evaluating cardiogenic effects via echocardiography. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 261, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.22.08.0371

  150. Webb, J.K., Keller, K.A., Chinnadurai, S.K., Kadotani, S., Allender, M.C., Fries, R., 2021. OPTIMIZING THE PHARMACODYNAMICS AND EVALUATING CARDIOGENIC EFFECTS OF THE INJECTABLE ANESTHETIC ALFAXALONE IN PRAIRIE RATTLESNAKES (CROTALUS VIRIDIS). J Zoo Wildl Med 52, 1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1638/2021-0056

  151. Wei, Y., Hori, A., Chen, I.-Y., Tamogi, H., Hirokawa, T., Kato, K., Itami, T., Sano, T., Yamashita, K., 2022. Maximum volume of nasal administration using a mucosal atomization device without aspiration in Japanese White rabbits. J Vet Med Sci 84, 792–798. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.21-0648

  152. West, J.A., 2017. Alfaxalone. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 26, 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jepm.2017.01.001

  153. Wharton, K.N., Walsh, C.A., Haulter, M., Ekanayake, D., Ekanayake-Alper, D., 2024. Sedation Efficacy of Midazolam in Conjunction with Ketamine and Alfaxalone in Female Laboratory Guinea Pigs (Cavia porcellus) [WWW Document]. https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-000028

  154. White, D.M., Martinez-Taboada, F., 2019. Induction of Anesthesia with Intravenous Alfaxalone in Two Isa Brown Chickens (gallus Gallus Domesticus). Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 29, 119–122. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jepm.2018.06.003

  155. Whittem, T., Pasloske, K.S., Heit, M.C., Ranasinghe, M.G., 2008. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alfaxalone in cats after single and multiple intravenous administration of Alfaxan® at clinical and supraclinical doses. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 31, 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2008.00998.x

  156. Wilkinson, R., 2004a. Chapter 16 Therapeutics, in: McArthur’s Medicine and Surgery of Tortoises and Turtles. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom, pp. 465–486.

  157. Wilkinson, R., 2004b. Chapter 17 Formulary, in: McArthur’s Medicine and Surgery of Tortoises and Turtles. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom, pp. 487–503.

  158. Williams, B.H., 2000. Therapeutics in Ferrets. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice, Therapeutics 3, 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1094-9194(17)30098-1

  159. Wrobbel, T., 2018. Igel in der Tierarztpraxis: mit zahlreichen Tabellen zu Behandlung und Medikation, 7., aktualisierte Auflage. ed, Igelwissen kompakt. Pro Igel e.V, Lindau/B.

  160. Yaw, T.J., Mans, C., Johnson, S.M., Doss, G.A., Sladky, K.K., 2018. Effect of injection site on alfaxalone-induced sedation in ball pythons (Python regius). J Small Anim Pract 59, 747–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12918

  161. Yee, M., Ambros, B., Beaufrère, H., Desprez, I., 2023. Subcutaneous alfaxalone for sedation of the domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo). Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 46, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jepm.2023.03.005

  162. Young, M.S., Kelly, J.C., Anderson, S.R., Riffle, L.A., Spears, S.L., Kalen, J.D., Suess-Radford, E., Gulani, J., 2024. Subcutaneous Alfaxalone-Xylazine-Buprenorphine for Surgical Anesthesia and Echocardiographic Evaluation of Mice (Mus musculus). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 63, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000090

  163. Zaki, S., Ticehurst, K., Miyaki, Y., 2009. Clinical evaluation of Alfaxan-CD® as an intravenous anaesthetic in young cats. Australian Veterinary Journal 87, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2009.00390.x

  164. Zec, S., Mitchell, M.A., Rockwell, K., Lindemann, D., 2024. Evaluating the Anesthetic and Physiologic Effects of Intramuscular and Intravenous Alfaxalone in Eastern Mud Turtles (Kinosternon subrubrum). Animals (Basel) 14, 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14030460



Monograph Primer Editor(s) 

  • Details Editor 0011

Monograph Primer Author(s)

  • Details: Author 0011

__________________________________

AI Assistance Disclosure 

  • Language Support and Format: The authors used  ScienceDirect AI, ChatGPT-5,  ResearchRabbit, Perplexity, Grammarly, and Anara to support language refinement, formatting, and stylistic consistency. 

  • Coding and UX: Additionally, OpenAI’s ChatGPT-5 assisted with coding, user interface, and user experience development for the project website. 

  • Delphi Development: The COMET Initiative’s DelphiManager web-based platform was used to facilitate the building, management, and administration of the multi-round Delphi survey process.

AI Intergrity Statement

  • AI tools were not used to generate scientific content or interpretation. 

  • Model training was disabled, no confidential or personal data were entered, and all outputs were reviewed, tested, validated against peer-reviewed sources where applicable, and edited by the authors and editors. 

  • Authors and editors accept full responsibility for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of the manuscript, the associated digital resources, and the Delphi survey process.

__________________________________

Reference Management  


Fomulary Primary copy_edited.png

bottom of page